Area
Housing, permits & tenant evidence
Two independent products, each bounded by what has actually been checked. Permit Bearings orients a California housing-permit applicant against a source-linked statewide baseline, and Habitable keeps a tenant’s repair trail in the tenant’s own hands. Neither has been validated by a planner, a jurisdiction, or a real legal matter, and each page says so.
Tools you can use today
Permit Bearings: know the path in
I designed and deployed a California housing-permitting prototype that screens a bounded statewide ADU, JADU, and SB 9 baseline across 541 recognized jurisdictions and produces a printable handoff for local staff. Woodland remains the deep synthetic packet fixture; no applicant, planner, or jurisdiction has validated it.
Habitable: keep the repair trail in tenants’ hands
I designed and built a working local-first alpha that turns conditions, repair requests, responses, and captured media into a source-aware repair trail and deliberate review copy—without a project-operated tenant-case database. It has only synthetic examples and is not ready for real legal matters.
Questions I get asked
What have you built for housing?
Permit Bearings screens a bounded statewide ADU, JADU, and SB 9 baseline across 541 recognized California jurisdictions and produces a printable handoff for local staff. Habitable is a working local-first alpha that turns conditions, repair requests, responses, and captured media into a source-aware repair trail, without a project-operated tenant-case database.
What does the evidence not show?
No applicant, planner, or jurisdiction has validated Permit Bearings; Woodland is a synthetic fixture. Habitable has only synthetic examples and is not ready for real legal matters. Both case studies keep those limits next to the claims.